Posted November 1, 200717 yr http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306678,00.html Look at the pic its only half a tank... (altough i think this is a photoshop picture... Seeing its hard to take a pic of an invisible tank) Immagine that falling into the wrong hands...
November 1, 200717 yr http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306678,00.html Look at the pic its only half a tank... (altough i think this is a photoshop picture... Seeing its hard to take a pic of an invisible tank) Immagine that falling into the wrong hands... WOW an awsome find of a story! hell of a find http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/10/31/ntank131big.jpg found this and this http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/10_04/DisappearTankLL_468x182.jpg
November 1, 200717 yr That's pretty awesome, it will probably take them a while though until it's ready to survive a real war.
November 1, 200717 yr Author now personaly i see the technology used on artillery or strategic buildings (if easy to use) As well first of all if you the enemy cant see the tank, neither can you, making it hard to coordinate fire and so. Second of all you pretty much hear a tank comming, and dust and so comming up from the driving. But darn that must be an advantage...
November 1, 200717 yr http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,306678,00.html Look at the pic its only half a tank... (altough i think this is a photoshop picture... Seeing its hard to take a pic of an invisible tank) Immagine that falling into the wrong hands... Read the article, and the caption to the photo, and you'll realize what you're looking at is "photoshop'd". Also, don't forget to follow the youtube video link. This idea has been around a long time!
November 1, 200717 yr Thats pretty cool, imagine when they have a suit or something you can put on and make yourself invisible
November 1, 200717 yr Thats pretty cool, imagine when they have a suit or something you can put on and make yourself invisible They do, watch the video in the link. Its relatively new technology, so it isnt flawless, but yeah, they have it.
November 2, 200717 yr well imo we really dont need it for our tanks since we pretty much roll over any other tank.
November 2, 200717 yr well imo we really dont need it for our tanks since we pretty much roll over any other tank. the more protection we can get our fine folk out there the better imo
November 2, 200717 yr The only problem I see with this is that it still wont stop radar and infared and that is what our equipment utilizes most now days. Pretty cool though especially if it could be used for soldiers on the ground. I heard a year or two ago that it was hundreds of smaller cameras not one large one maybe they changed their minds.
November 2, 200717 yr Am I the only one who noticed this article was posted on Fox News? This coming from the same people blaming the California wildfires on Al Qaeda?
November 2, 200717 yr So who's job is it to hold the battlefield projector and will this be the military equivalent of the audio/visual club?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.