May 9, 200421 yr Ferrari and ducati 2 italian company's that are their leaders in their field http://www.motorbox.com/Upload/w/wallpaperducati999-350810242.jpg http://www.motorbox.com/Upload/w/wallpaperducati999-35088001.jpg http://www.motorbox.com/Upload/w/wallpaperducati999-350810246.jpg Question: Without looking on the net how much do u think this bike costs. Considering it has a top speed just a little over 300km/h or 200mph. Btw this is not the fastest production bike by far. But it is the most expensive production bike.
May 9, 200421 yr I'm going to go with seven-hundred-trillon dollars??? Maybe a little more.. depending on the reactor size..
May 9, 200421 yr no the fastest production bike is the hyabusa, i can pull 0-60 in 2.4seconds on factory standard settings, top speed in excess of 220. that comes in at £12k
May 9, 200421 yr Author yup both shotty and killer from away are right. The fastest bike in the world (in mass production) is the Suzuki Hayabusa which goes up to 220mph standard. It has a 1300CC engine with 250HP. If you increase the bore and put a turbo on it u get up to 450HP. But this is the most expensive mass production bike costing around 20K the 999S is 29K.
May 9, 200421 yr ducatis so overpriced for their performance, lol the busa does not go up to 220mph standard its got a stock limiter installed on it , so it wont succeed over 191.4 mph, and it actally has 175hp claimed not 250 and holy crappies a busa with a straight bore with a turbo claiming 450 hp ?? im sorry but only way yer gettin those hp is if yer pushin over 50 psi and u also have enought money to buy yer self another 1299cc engine, sorry i had to flame on you kinda mano war but i get in detail about bikes
May 9, 200421 yr Author Ok they put the limiter in the 2002 model the 2001 has no limiter. The thing with going to 450HP is actually true. The thing of it not going over 200mph is actually intriguing for me because i dont know where u got it. Probably from the limiter but without the limiter its around 200+mph and i saw it with my own eyes. Right now i am going to try to show u some articles with the 450HP because its no joke.
May 9, 200421 yr next time you are on MSN i gonna send you some videos Azn, see what a turbo busa really like!
May 10, 200421 yr yeah 450 at the fly or 450 at the rw cuz u have to be specific man, what stage is it ? like i said what psi?
May 10, 200421 yr Author Well honestly i am not certain but i think it is on the Rear Wheel. I dont know the PSI exactly but ill look into it.
May 10, 200421 yr Hayabusa!!!! My name is so cool. And Ducati's are way overpriced for their performance. If you want more bang for your buck, you can't go wrong with any motorcycle from Suzuki's GSX-R series. 8) http://www.speedscycle.com/bikes/newducs.asp <--- They say that the 2004 Ducati 999s costs $22,995.00 (US) (Told ya'. Ridiculously overpriced.) Personally, the GSX-R's look so much sweeter. And the 2004 GSX-R 1000 is only $10,499.00 (US). http://www.motorbikes.be/en/compare/4129/3915/ Just check the stats. The Suzuki is just better performance at a lower price.
May 10, 200421 yr Author yup but they are damn sweet. If i would go for a new bike i would go for the R1 the new one
May 10, 200421 yr Hayabusa!!!! My name is so cool. And Ducati's are way overpriced for their performance. If you want more bang for your buck, you can't go wrong with any motorcycle from Suzuki's GSX-R series. 8) http://www.speedscycle.com/bikes/newducs.asp <--- They say that the 2004 Ducati 999s costs $22,995.00 (US) (Told ya'. Ridiculously overpriced.) Personally, the GSX-R's look so much sweeter. And the 2004 GSX-R 1000 is only $10,499.00 (US). http://www.motorbikes.be/en/compare/4129/3915/ Just check the stats. The Suzuki is just better performance at a lower price. Hey be carefull, they have a copyright on your name .... lol
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.