April 16, 200521 yr Doesn't matter who's making it, what engine it's one, or if I'm paying for it or not. They don't tweak the Garand up a notch (Either more damage or less recoil, NOT both), I ain't playin' it. :peace:
April 16, 200521 yr Doesn't matter who's making it, what engine it's one, or if I'm paying for it or not. They don't tweak the Garand up a notch (Either more damage or less recoil, NOT both), I ain't playin' it. :peace: the garand was a one shot kill rifle to begin with (when you hit someone above the waist)what else can they do with it?
April 19, 200521 yr Well, they could make it automatic, add an M203.. belt-fed.. Put it inside of a tank... put the tank inside a plane.. put the plane inside a space-ship.. put a huge laser on the outside of the spaceship.. BAMMM... smoked the Germans.. it's that simple..
April 20, 200521 yr I play both sides of the war. As a result, I play with all the weapons. And when I compare my kill rate with a K98 with a Garand, the kill ratio is waaaaaay off in favor of the K98. That in no way in hell is balanced, I don't care what ANYBODY says. That's my opinion, nothing more. Instead of playing and frustrating myself and bitching about it, I just won't play. End of story.
April 20, 200521 yr garand is semi automatic, larger clip k98 is bolt action, more dmg and slightly more acc. smaller clip its fair
April 20, 200521 yr HOW WE HAVE TO PAY FOR IT! My god, thats such utter crap. Value is really pushing their luck bigtime, with an unfinished product release, horrible packaging, a long wait for deathmatch, the only thing they did right was CS:S. And when they finally port somthing decent over, they charge a fee. You have all missed the point. He called Valve Value. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
April 20, 200521 yr I'm just going to have to disagree. I'm not going to play a game I find more aggrivating than CSS and unbalanced where it matters to me. (So why the hell am I argueing about it?) Said my piece, you all disagree. Guess I'll leave it at that.
April 20, 200521 yr If you were able to get the springfield with no scope (like enfield with no scope) for allies, this would fix the kar problem. Now everyone could bolt action and kill with 1 bullet.
April 20, 200521 yr If you were able to get the springfield with no scope (like enfield with no scope) for allies, this would fix the kar problem. Now everyone could bolt action and kill with 1 bullet. the british had that, their two lee enfields were almost exactly the same, except one had a scope for the sniper class
April 20, 200521 yr the british had that, their two lee enfields were almost exactly the same, except one had a scope for the sniper class uh If you were able to get the springfield with no scope (like enfield with no scope) for allies, this would fix the kar problem. Now everyone could bolt action and kill with 1 bullet. even though everyone would now have the insta kill gun, if they just put a class limit on it, the game would be set.
April 22, 200521 yr You have all missed the point. He called Valve Value. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL .....
April 22, 200521 yr You have all missed the point. He called Valve Value. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ahahahhahahahhahahahahha good one -G
May 10, 200520 yr There are some of us who actually bought HL2 in a store. Ive never really liked DoD any way, i prefer games like FA, CS, and the new mod PoA.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.