May 25, 200520 yr Anyone played it? Got friends that have it? I'm probably going to buy it irregardless but any comments on the game are welcome.
May 25, 200520 yr is it for PSP? if so: D:! i like MGS games(is it an MGS game or a different one?)! i must have it now....
May 25, 200520 yr its different from most mgs games, its a turn based card strategy games. i know most reviews said it was bad but one of my friends has it and says its actually kind of fun to play. i guess when people heard it was a card game they immediately turned it down and hated it.
May 26, 200520 yr Author well I bought it. It is different but fun and definately the hardest PSP game I own. The first level took me like 3 hours.
May 26, 200520 yr D'oh! i dont want a PSP, they cost too much for a Birthday gift! i was trying to see if GuildWars was any good...anyone know if it is worth getting?
May 26, 200520 yr Anyone played it? Got friends that have it? I'm probably going to buy it irregardless but any comments on the game are welcome. fyi: "irregardless" is not a word. "regardless" is what you're looking for.
May 26, 200520 yr Turning MGS into a "turn based" game was about the most retarded thing a company could do. I remember reading a little comic about it, its like a guy sneaks up behind snake, and snake turns around "hah! you used your turn sneaking up on me, so now i will use the Kill painfully card" and theres a guy behind the wall "Wish i didn't spend my turn eating this burger ) EDIT, stevo, Guild wars > PSP PSP in my opinion isn't worth the money it costs to get as of now. it has few games that are truly worth the price, and unless you must have some of the games that are out or coming out for it, and travel alot, then its not worth it. At least not at the price it is now.
May 27, 200520 yr Author irregardless adv : regardless; a combination of irrespective and regardless sometimes used humorously. Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so. source:http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardless Sorry to ruin your completely useless reply to my thread. Open wide.
May 27, 200520 yr I was posting about MGS:A, and answering Stevos question So... it does have some use to this thread. he was... talking to klif
May 27, 200520 yr he was... talking to klif oops Should quote the person next time basald >.< Since you posted right after me.
May 27, 200520 yr ...many mistakenly believe to be correct... ...blizzard of condemnation... ...improper yoking... ...logical absurdity... ...ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term... ...considered a blunder for decades... *shrug* whatev'. I stand by it.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.