Posted March 15, 200619 yr http://www.plastk.net/ Only 15-30 fps on Quake 3 at that resolution, but still looks like fun.
March 15, 200619 yr thats just plain crazy. lol god i can imagine playing EQ2 or FA with that. lol -G
March 15, 200619 yr Awesome. I might be seeing that in a couple years, because he's at Virginia Tech. (If I don't get into MIT)
March 16, 200619 yr Interesting, these guys are from Virginia Tech. That's where I went to skool! GO HOKIES!
March 17, 200619 yr Woah........but why are they playing old games?? Shouldnt they play newer games??
March 17, 200619 yr Author Woah........but why are they playing old games?? Shouldnt they play newer games?? Sounds like the system can't handle anything recent.
March 20, 200619 yr to play at a higher resolution, yes. outputting 800x600 highly detailed pixels is a lot easier than 10240x3072 highly detailed pixels.
March 20, 200619 yr Impressive but could they beat anyone with wallhack or aimbot? No. Could they beat anyone with a 'proper' config? Probably not. BTW: a week or so ago there was an information that some Spanish team won a CS:S tournament (LAN) using an illegal config. Their rivals suspected that since the very beginning of the tournament and informed the judges but the last ones decided to check it AFTER the final match of the Spanish Team (they won the tournament, beating opponents 16-3 in Finals). The judges were (probably) too afraid to admit they were wrong since the beginning. They didn't want to change every single result of the Spaniards (who would play in Finals then?). So why bother?
March 22, 200619 yr hmm i didnt know that u need a better gfx card to play on a bigger screen?? Well, they are playing at a huge resolution. Your going to need a beast to run it that high
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.