September 16, 200718 yr Well here is my try I hope you like it, I really didnt like the render so I found one that I thought looked better. I think it came out pretty good:D
September 16, 200718 yr Nice one Weihe! I was gonna use that same render and go for something like that when I saw this thread, but I was a little late lol. I didn't see this thread yesterday. Anyways, very nice job!
September 16, 200718 yr Well here is my try I hope you like it, I really didnt like the render so I found one that I thought looked better. I think it came out pretty good:D SpcWeihe, that looks great ...nice work.
September 17, 200718 yr thanx guys I am glad you guys like it, and ripper to me the text doesnt have to stand out because the focal point is the render, thats why sometimes I dont like text at all in my sigs.
September 17, 200718 yr Heres my try Ding! And yes I was to lazy to upload to gallery again /monthly_06_2011/post-168-130810201128_thumb.gif /monthly_06_2011/post-168-130810221949_thumb.gif
September 17, 200718 yr thanx guys I am glad you guys like it, and ripper to me the text doesnt have to stand out because the focal point is the render, thats why sometimes I dont like text at all in my sigs. The text, mate, makes or breaks a signature. It does have to stand out. It does have to look nice. I once heard someone say, "Either make the text look good or don't put it in the sig at all." But the rule of thumb there is, 80% of signatures need some sort of text. A sig has to be something REALLY special to not have text. Focal points are not what a signature is about (although they can make or break a sig too), and they are especially not a reason to half-ass another part of the sig. Just thought I'd throw my two cents in there before I told you that the sig, other than the text (which is an easy fix), looks good.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.