Posted December 1, 20168 yr https://directvnow.com OMG I just signed up. 3 months pre pay so I get a free appletv for free ($150 value) the base package is $35 for 60 channels but right now they have a promo . 122 channels for $35. IF you pre pay 1 month you get a amazon fire stick. If you pre pay 3 months its an apple tv. Truley amazing quality. It works on your phone or tablet or smart tv. The $35 is a promo price but as long as you don't change anything and keep your account up to date it will not go up to the $60 normal price. (unless channel prices go up) Check it out and compare it to your normal tv bill. It isn't as cheap as primewire.ag but it is easier to use.
December 1, 20168 yr I read an article today that said it is costing them $30 a month just for the programming. I too have signed up, and really like it.
December 2, 20168 yr I signed up just for all the discovery, science channel, and history channel video on demand :-D
December 2, 20168 yr nope why? Honestly, your post looked like a spam advertisement. Also, good luck with all that shiz guys. I've worked for those companies in the past and they're out to bone you.
December 2, 20168 yr 13 hours ago, Axlerod said: https://directvnow.com OMG I just signed up. 3 months pre pay so I get a free appletv for free ($150 value) the base package is $35 for 60 channels but right now they have a promo . 122 channels for $35. IF you pre pay 1 month you get a amazon fire stick. If you pre pay 3 months its an apple tv. Truley amazing quality. It works on your phone or tablet or smart tv. The $35 is a promo price but as long as you don't change anything and keep your account up to date it will not go up to the $60 normal price. (unless channel prices go up) Check it out and compare it to your normal tv bill. It isn't as cheap as primewire.ag but it is easier to use. Who the fuk watches TV? Is that a thing of the past? Just say'n. :ohmy:
December 2, 20168 yr Author Then spend your money elsewhere. All entertainment is out to bone you. TV, music, video games. Don't buy it. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S7 using tapatalk
December 2, 20168 yr Honestly, your post looked like a spam advertisement. Also, good luck with all that shiz guys. I've worked for those companies in the past and they're out to bone you. May as well give up your smartphone then. I don't know about you, but I'm paying $150 a month for a family smartphone plan and that is getting beyond ridiculous already. Not only that, but two of the major cellphone companies want to merge... Yea, T-Mobile sucks as far as coverage, but they are like mad lowering costs for their own service and actually forced Verizon to drop their prices a bit. Which companies aren't out to bone us? If we are lucky, we'll get a company like AT&T ready put their ass on the line and offer a cut-rate service at a loss just to get word of mouth.
December 2, 20168 yr Author Just wait for 5g to launch. you will give up your cable company all together. http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/what-is-5g-a-rough-guide-to-the-next-generation-of-mobile-networks
December 2, 20168 yr May look into it. My cable bill is at 2 hundy a month. course I have the biggest TV package , Phone and Top tier internet so I suppose it all works out
December 2, 20168 yr I dont do contracts and even if I did--military orders would get me out. I generally pay the upfront cost to avoid contracting or get it free (never paid for a phone). When I say bone you, I mean criminally. I left a specific company related to this thread due to its business practices preying too heavily on my conscience. So, I'm offering a fair warning that streaming is the way to go.
December 2, 20168 yr 47 minutes ago, jinXyKO said: I dont do contracts and even if I did--military orders would get me out. Are you in the military? I didn't now that. What service? What do you do? :klinked:
December 2, 20168 yr This is a streaming service It's not perfect, spent over an hour with them on the phone yesterday because I was getting error 40, but if you're having problems go here, https://forums.att.com/t5/DIRECTV-NOW-Forum/ct-p/DIRECTV_NOW Kinda feel bad for unleashing Axlerod on them :-P
December 3, 20168 yr 20 hours ago, Axlerod said: Just wait for 5g to launch. you will give up your cable company all together. http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/what-is-5g-a-rough-guide-to-the-next-generation-of-mobile-networks Looking forward to 5G Thanks for sharing Bro.... :thumbsup:
January 2, 20178 yr Author http://streamingtvguides.com/ Great TV guide for online TV. By the way, Jan 9th is the last day for the $35 promo for Directv Now that gets you 102 channels. AT&T Is Ending DirecTV Now $35 Monthly Pricing for 100-Channel Bundle In October, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson vowed that DirecTV Now would disrupt the pay-TV biz with revolutionary pricing: The internet-streaming service would launch for a mere $35 per month for a package with more than 100 channels, dramatically undercutting other TV bundles. Turns out, the theatrical flourish was a very limited-time promo offer. This week, AT&T revealed that the $35 monthly introductory offer for the DirecTV Now “Go Big” package will end Jan. 9, 2017 — less than six weeks after the telco launched the over-the-top package. After Jan. 9, new subscribers who sign up for DirecTV Now’s Go Big tier with after Jan. 9 will pay $60 per month. Existing subs will continue to pay the $35-per-month rate for now, but the company also said the fees may increase at some future date. In addition, “channels, features, and terms (are) subject to change & may be discontinued without notice,” AT&T said in a notice on the DirecTV Now website. DirecTV Now Debuts, Reveals Full Channel Lineups DirecTV Now bundles start at $35 monthly for the “Live a Little” package with 64 channels (plus local stations where available), and range up to the top-tier “Gotta Have It” package with up to 130 channels for $70 per month. Cord-cutters and “cord-never” consumers are expected to gravitate to the entry-level package — which analysts say AT&T appears to be offering at negative net margin. Local channels on DirecTV Now are available for only select markets from ABC, NBC, Fox and Telemundo, where the broadcasters have owned-and-operated stations. AT&T says that where it does not offer local broadcast channels, it provides day-after-air primetime shows on-demand. Subscribers can add HBO and Cinemax for a limited-time promo price of $5 each to any DirecTV Now package. In addition, regional sports networks including those from Comcast SportsNet, Fox Sports Networks, YES Network are available in only specific markets (and only in the $50-per-month or higher tiers). CBS is currently not available, though AT&T says it is in talks with the broadcaster about including CBS and Showtime. AT&T Unveils DirecTV Now and Sets Channel Pacts With Taylor Swift, Reese Witherspoon DirecTV Now initially is available to stream on Apple TV (fourth generation), Amazon Fire TV and Fire Stick TV, Google Chromecast, iPad and iPhone, Android 4.4 and later, and Internet Explorer 11 (on Windows 8 and later), Chrome version 50 and later, and Safari 8 and later. The service is limited to two simultaneous streams per account, which AT&T said is designed to ensure it delivers the highest-quality video possible to devices in the home. AT&T recommends DirecTV Now customers have broadband connection speeds of 2.5 to 5 Mbps per stream for HD quality, while it recommends 150 Kbps to 2.5 Mbps broadband connection speeds for mobile devices. The service also offers more than 15,000 TV episodes and movies on-demand. DirecTV Now does not include DVR functions, which are slated to be introduced in 2017, but it does include a 72-hour “catch-up” VOD feature for programming on many channels. DirecTV Now is available in the U.S., but not in Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. Users are unable to access the service outside the United States. As an incentive for AT&T wireless customers to sign up for DirecTV Now, the telco does not count the OTT service’s streaming video toward monthly data usage. The FCC’s wireless bureau issued letters to both AT&T and Verizon asserting that such “zero-rated” services are anticompetitive and violate the agency’s network neutrality rules — a charge both telco giants have refuted.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.