Miyamoto Musashi

:roll: And how do YOU know THAT?

:roll:

And who are you? :?

As always, I have something negative to say, but I'll hold it back for once.

You know, whom i meant, Bane. Dont turn the tale around.And youre making my 'realtionship' with Her sound wrong. Hentai...

Really? Where is She? I checked everywhere. And you forgot to add red-eyed to that. Thats Her most distinguished feature... Plus i think any pole knows or at least understands the languages of his cold war neighbours.

If i am not mistaken, Azirafal and Bane have a Grandma, that lives with them, who doesnt speak polish much. Her primary language of communication is russian. Hence their extreme knowledge. I, myself, have studied russian long, long time ago, so i am not fluent with it anymore.

Yeah, thats what they all say...

Wiem. Poza moimi Koleżankami ze średniaka to prawdę mówiąc nie ma tam tak pięknych Kobiet, jak u mnie na wydziale.

I dont know, when this virus apearred, but its extremely lethal and works regardless of infected computer or operation system. It is easily recognizible and becouse of message it displays its been named 'Albanian Virus' or 'Manual Virus'.The reason it is so dangerous is becouse it exploits the most flawed part of any computer: its user.The way it starts working is by displaying this message on screen:"Hello! I am Albanian Virus, but becouse my country of origin is technological backwater, i cant do a thing. So please delete some important file from your computer and send me further. Thank You!"The rest is up to user... to delete something like kernel. :idea:

You've seen my picture. I havent changed very much (except in side dimension) from the time it had been taken (3-4 years).

Well, from my point of view, on my year, in my Institute, we have only one or two (from about ten) Women, who could be considered as not-very-pretty.Uniwerek i Medyk moze iść sobie daleko... daleko.

Hah! This is nothing, compared to things my student friends know. Some of them are real masterminds. I am simply a mediocre, if not bottom-of-the-shelf student here. As for studying Women instead. We have some were pretty Women in our Institute. So i can do both.

Relevence between the parts of my first post is small. First part was meant to explain the lightbulb effect. Second was mean to show, that speed of light can be exceeded, although not in the way most people think.I prefer to see the speed of light as mass-energy and time-and-space relations. But so far i have had not very much of that. Some basic Theory of Relativity on Physics' Basics and on Electrodynamics, but thats about it. Next semester we are having Quantum Relativity so i am hoping to catch up.

Same here...

I have. Although works poorly. Seems to crash very often. Sometimes every 5 minutes.

Still my question havent been answered in satysfying manner.Yay or Nay?

Pierniczysz. Do tej pory kazda strona przeciwna byla rebelianckimi szumowinami. Teraz postanowilem grac tak, jak flagi pokazuja. Znaczy czerwoni to Imperialisci, niebiescy - rebelianci. A, ze wy gracie tylko po niebieskiej znaczy, zescie rebelianty.

I was wondering if you could pull this off:To change Red Force name to Imperial Forces and Blue Force to Rebel Forces.I scanned all FA directory, but couldnt find anything, that would do just that. Is this accomplishable or are the names preset?

Anti matter exists. The definition is kinda tricky though. THats becouse anti-matter needs to have correlated matter. Here it is: Matter-Antimatter: Electrones-Pozytones Protons-Antiprotons Neutrons-None Neutrinos-Antineutrinos (electronite (?), taon, mion) Quark-Antiquark (Up, DOwn, Bottom, Top, Strange, Charm, few more which i cant remeber at this hour [2am]) Many more... and last but not least Photon-Photon (photons are anti-matter for each other or so i heard such opinion). Antimatter has positive mass, but differes by having opposite charge. You get antimatter mostly in nucleus effects: when nucleus breaks into 2 it produces neutrinos and antineutrinos (apart from other things of course). I dont remember exactly, but from what i do remember is that 0.989MeV of energy is needed to create a pair electron-pozyton though what are the other conditions i dont remember. I have had most difficult time understanding what You have written. From what i gather: - In space there is a friction. Constantly, becouse space is not that thoroughly empty. Only in pure vacuum you get no friction. - If we had no magnetosphere or it would be weaker, we would be taken out by both high-energy particles and radiation. - Ionized particles coming from the sun, when affected by magnetoshpere, are driven in the direction of the magnetic poles. The friction of them entering atmosphere and coliding with it creates the coloristic effects of aurora. - Oh yeah. Although many have tried they havent yet discovered magnetic monopole. The basic magnetic structure is dipole. - But what You meant bu 'light speed being most different' I HAVE NO IDEA!!!...

Dynamo, we were talkin not only theoreticly but also more-than theoreticly. I said that nothing can move at speed of light, unless its' stationary mass is =>0, right? What we are doing in fact is making it go at ~c[/]. Problems like powering the lightbulb are as easily ignored as the fact, that in kinematics we are using moving points instead of objects with sizes (mathematicly speaking we use Dirac's Delta instead of a function to describe their position in space). Also, disintegrate is not the right word i think. Collapse is more like it.

You may laugh, but i remember that site very well. And that post as well.

My professors would make it better of course. But they work also abroad and know all the words needed.I hope i used correct words.

No beer for you, until you comprehend it all and much more (lets say quantum relativity). I guess its time for you to become abstinent then, eh?Really, its not that complicated. Maybe that is why most of our students drink lot of beer.

Killer asked me yesterday on server: "If a lit lightbulb would travel at speed of light (c), would we see the lightbulb lit or not?" Well, to tell you the truth, i have no idea, what would we see. There are many things to be taken into consideration. Some might think that we might see the lightbuld from the direction it is heading, and not from 'the back'. Well, the velocity addition, when considering high velocities is a little different from low-velocity physics of Newton. Newton physics tells, that matter can go as fast as it wants, as long as the force is doing its' work. In Einstein physics, no matter how fast you go, the light around you still travels at c. That is becouse no matter how big velocities you add, you still get <=c. If you add c+c, you will still get as a result c. Conclusion is this: I think we should be able to see some image of lightbulb, that means we would see the light coming from it, from every direction. But what exactly would we see, i have no idea. Thats becouse nothing with static mass =>0 can achieve the speed of light (doing that would increase their mass to infinity, shrink them to a point and would require infinite energy). Now physics knows of things, that, even taken relatively, can go faster than c. It all boils down to the definition of velocity. Everything that changes, can have a velocity (or more commonly momentum) added as a status to it. Coming down to kinematic things, we shall take a closer look at waves. Now, i have a problem you know. The following might be more difficult to understand. Well, lets try. Lets say we have waves, made of two interpolated waves (it will be more readable this way). This wave of ours has two velocities, that can define its' movement through space. One is a group velocity (if we had one wave, it would be just wave velocity. n this case the group velocity becomes wave velocity), which is velocity of propagation of peaks. The second is a phase velocity, which is the velocity of propagation of the constant phase of the wave (here is the reason i used interpolated waves, with single wave, it could be difficult to differ group and phase velocity). Group and phase velocity are not the same thing, which i will show further (which will also help me explain the main topic). Lets now say, that our wave is a relative sea wave, which hits the shore. Now lets say, that we have this bizzare situation, when wave hits the shore like this: SHORE | | | | | | ^^^^^^^^^^ WAVE We take as a point of reference a point on the shore. Lets see what is happening. The phase of wave is moving along the shore, so the phase velocity is the same as group velocity. The head of the wave travels in relation to the shore with the same speed the whole wave is. Now lets shift our wave, so it hits the shore at an angle: SHORE |///////// |//////// |/////// |////// |///// |//// WAVE In this situation we connot tell the phase velocity is the same as group velocity. The head of the wave hits the shore, and the velocity of propagation of contact between head and shore (phase velocity) si different from the group velocity (which is always the same and is directed at the way the wave is propagating). Now if the wave hits the shore head-on: SHORE || || || || || || WAVE all the points on the head of the wave hit the shore at exactly the same time, the phase travels along the shore at an infinite speed, thus the phase velocity is in fact infinite. So, even if our wave travels slower than c, becouse we said the wave was relative (and the actually what we measure as the speed of propagation is the group velocity), the phase velocity is infinite. This effect is visible also in electronics, in 'long lines'. Whew........... i told You, Killer, there would be much of typing. I just hope its understandable, more or less.